Today, Mitt Romney said that during the campaign, he didn't mean what he said.
Or was it that he didn't say what he meant?
But also today says that HE should be in Washington because HE could solve this whole mess.
Is he saying what he doesn't mean?
Or is he not saying what he means?
I think in cases like this we should defer to Donald Rumsfeld who would explain:
We know what we know, We know what we don't know, but we don't know what we don't know.
Or do we?
